Washington Hispanic logo
Metro page link
Actualidad page link
Espectaculos page link
Deportes page link
CasaGuia page link
AutoGuia page link
Gente page link
Metro page link
Nacional page link
Espectaculos page link
Deportes page link
CasaGuia page link
AutoGuia page link
Gente page link

 

Divider Contact Us page link Divider Past Issues page link Divider El tiempo en la region, weather channel page link
President urge fellow Republicans to back his proposals
Bush faces Senate rebellion on tribunals

A Senate committee rebelled against President George W. Bush on Thursday, passing a bill it said would protect the rights of foreign terrorism suspects and repair a U.S. image damaged by harsh treatment of detainees.

Hours after Bush went to Capitol Hill to urge fellow Republicans to back his proposals for putting terrorism suspects on trial, a divided Senate Armed Services Committee approved its own bill which it said would provide fair trials and meet demands of the U.S. Supreme Court that struck down Bush's original plan.

The committee also resisted Bush's bid to more narrowly define the Geneva Conventions' standards for humane treatment of prisoners, which Bush said was essential to enable the CIA to elicit valuable information from detainees.

The bill -- pushed by chairman John Warner of Virginia and fellow Republican heavyweights John McCain of Arizona and Lindsey Graham of South Carolina -- cleared the committee 15-9 with support from Democrats and Maine Republican Susan Collins.

The full Senate will take up the issue as early as next week, meaning Republicans could be in a bitter debate among themselves over national security issues which they view as key to keeping control of the House and Senate.

Democrats have stayed out of the fray, letting the Republicans show their divisions over Bush's handling of detainees scooped up since the September 11 attacks killed nearly 3,000 people five years ago.

WHITE HOUSE REACTS
Facing a possible loss in the Senate, the administration said after the vote it may wait to press its case when House and Senate negotiators meet at a conference to work out a final version of the bill.

Hoping to head off a rebellion over issues he insists are key to fighting the war on terrorism, Bush met early in the day in a closed session with House Republicans.

The committee bill would require that defendants have access to classified evidence used against them, limit the use of hearsay evidence and restrict the use of evidence obtained by coercion.

The main debate with the White House was over its effort to write definitions of what would be inhumane treatment under the Geneva Conventions. Administration officials said its standards were vague and must be clarified to protect CIA interrogators from prosecution and to allow the CIA's "high value terrorist detention" program to continue.

But Warner, McCain and Graham said that would encourage other countries to interpret the protections to meet their own needs, which would backfire on U.S. personnel in future wars.

McCain released a letter from Bush's former secretary of state, Colin Powell, that said the "world is beginning to doubt the moral basis of our fight against terrorism" and said he opposed Bush's bid to redefine the Geneva Conventions that require humane treatment of prisoners.

The White House countered with a letter from current Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice saying Bush's plan would "strengthen U.S. adherence" to the Geneva Conventions and would "help demonstrate to our international partners that we are committed to compliance" with the standards.
“ outrageous and dishonest” says the agency.

Back to top arrowBack to to

“outrageous and dishonest” says the agency
IAEA protests "erroneous" U.S. report on Iran

U.N. inspectors have protested to the U.S. government and a congressional committee about a report on Iran's nuclear work, calling parts of it "outrageous and dishonest," according to a letter obtained by Reuters.

The letter recalled clashes between the IAEA and the Bush administration before the 2003 Iraq war over findings cited by Washington about Iraqi weapons of mass destruction that proved false, and underlined tensions over Iran's dossier.

Sent to Rep. Peter Hoekstra of Michigan, Republican chairman of the House of Representatives Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence, by a senior aide to International Atomic Energy Agency chief Mohamed ElBaradei, the letter said an August 23 committee report contained serious distortions of IAEA findings on Iran's activity.

The letter said the errors suggested Iran's nuclear fuel program was much more advanced than a series of IAEA reports and Washington's own intelligence assessments had determined.

House committee spokesman Jamal Ware admitted a caption to a photo of the Natanz facility said incorrectly that Iran had produced weapons-grade material. He dismissed the error, saying it was not part of the body of the report.

" There's nothing substantive here. They complain about a photo caption and the other things are issues we apparently disagree on," Ware said in Washington. "There are no errors in the report."

The committee will decide whether to respond to the IAEA letter, he said.

The 29-page report was authored by the staff of a panel subcommittee and was never discussed or voted on by the full 21-member House Intelligence Committee.

Rep. Jane Harman of California, the panel's senior Democrat, advised party colleagues in an e-mail the report employed "analytical shortcuts" that presented Iran as a more dire threat than it is, aides said.

TAKING EXCEPTION
The IAEA letter said the agency secretariat took "strong exception to the incorrect and misleading assertion" that the IAEA opted to remove a senior safeguards inspector for supposedly concluding the purpose of Iran's program was to build weapons.

The congressional report contained "an outrageous and dishonest suggestion" the inspector was dumped for having not adhered to an alleged IAEA policy barring its "officials from telling the whole truth" about Iran, said the letter.
Diplomats say the inspector remains IAEA Iran section head.

Ware said report findings were based on discussions among committee staff and a variety of sources including IAEA staff members.

" This isn't erroneous. Our staff heard there was pressure to remove him because of concern about statements he made publicly about Iran's pursuit of weapons," he said.

The IAEA has been inspecting Iran's nuclear program since 2003. Although it has found no hard evidence Iran is working on atomic weapons, it has uncovered many activities linked to uranium enrichment, a process of purifying fuel for nuclear power plants or weapons.

Diplomats say Washington, spearheading efforts to isolate Iran with sanctions over its nuclear work, has long perceived ElBaradei to be "soft" on Tehran.

Back to top arrowBack to to

Metro | Nacional | Espectáculos | Deportes | CasaGuía |
AutoGuía | Gente | Conexiones | Subscriptions and Advertising |
Contact Us | Past Issues | El Tiempo | Site Map

Conexiones page link

portada

Week of 09/15
PDF

carta